Regulatory Framework
Administrative Constraints
EMB Relationship
Security & Well-being
Access to Electoral Data
Access to Funding
Dialogue & Consultation
Perception of Observers
Post-revolution transition, dialogue remains open
Composite Score: 6.5/10 — Narrowed
Post-revolution transition, dialogue remains open
Civic space is experiencing increasing restrictions. Observer activities face growing challenges.
Tunisia received a composite score of 6.5/10 in the 2025 AfEONet assessment, placing it in the Narrowed category. This assessment covers North Africa and evaluates eight dimensions of civic space for election observers.
| Dimension | Score | Visual |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Framework | 7/10 | ███████░░░ |
| Administrative Constraints | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| EMB Relationship | 7/10 | ███████░░░ |
| Security & Well-being | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| Access to Electoral Data | 7/10 | ███████░░░ |
| Access to Funding | 5/10 | █████░░░░░ |
| Dialogue & Consultation | 7/10 | ███████░░░ |
| Perception of Observers | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
The legal and regulatory environment for election observers in Tunisia provides solid foundations for civic engagement.
Administrative processes present manageable but notable obstacles for observer organizations seeking accreditation and access.
The relationship between civil society observer organizations and the Electoral Management Body is characterized by strong collaboration and mutual respect.
Physical security conditions for election observers present moderate concerns requiring vigilance.
Observer access to electoral data and transparency mechanisms is strong and institutionalized.
Financial sustainability for observer organizations is precarious, with heavy dependence on external sources.
Mechanisms for dialogue between observer organizations and government institutions are functional and inclusive.
Public and institutional perception of election observers is mixed, with some acceptance and some suspicion.
Based on the 2025 assessment, priority areas for improvement in Tunisia include:
This assessment is based on the AfEONet Report 2025: Eyes on the Ballot Watchers by Abel Eseru. Scores reflect evaluation of eight dimensions on a 0-10 scale:
| Score Range | Category |
|---|---|
| 9–10 | Open |
| 7–8 | Restricted |
| 5–6 | Obstructed |
| 3–4 | Repressed |
| 0–2 | Closed |
Note: Scores are estimates based on the report. Verification with AfEONet field data is recommended.
