Regulatory Framework
Administrative Constraints
EMB Relationship
Security & Well-being
Access to Electoral Data
Access to Funding
Dialogue & Consultation
Perception of Observers
Progressive decline, funding challenges
Composite Score: 6.0/10 — Obstructed
Progressive decline, funding challenges
Civic space faces significant obstacles. Observers encounter systematic barriers to their work.
Zambia received a composite score of 6.0/10 in the 2025 AfEONet assessment, placing it in the Obstructed category. This assessment covers Southern Africa and evaluates eight dimensions of civic space for election observers.
| Dimension | Score | Visual |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Framework | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| Administrative Constraints | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| EMB Relationship | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| Security & Well-being | 5/10 | █████░░░░░ |
| Access to Electoral Data | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| Access to Funding | 5/10 | █████░░░░░ |
| Dialogue & Consultation | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
| Perception of Observers | 6/10 | ██████░░░░ |
The legal and regulatory environment for election observers in Zambia offers partial protections with notable gaps.
Administrative processes present manageable but notable obstacles for observer organizations seeking accreditation and access.
The relationship between civil society observer organizations and the Electoral Management Body is mixed, with areas of cooperation alongside tensions.
Physical security conditions for election observers present moderate concerns requiring vigilance.
Observer access to electoral data and transparency mechanisms exists but faces systematic limitations.
Financial sustainability for observer organizations is precarious, with heavy dependence on external sources.
Mechanisms for dialogue between observer organizations and government institutions exist but are inconsistent.
Public and institutional perception of election observers is mixed, with some acceptance and some suspicion.
Based on the 2025 assessment, priority areas for improvement in Zambia include:
This assessment is based on the AfEONet Report 2025: Eyes on the Ballot Watchers by Abel Eseru. Scores reflect evaluation of eight dimensions on a 0-10 scale:
| Score Range | Category |
|---|---|
| 9–10 | Open |
| 7–8 | Restricted |
| 5–6 | Obstructed |
| 3–4 | Repressed |
| 0–2 | Closed |
Note: Scores are estimates based on the report. Verification with AfEONet field data is recommended.